<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>🧮 安全距离 on Elon&#39;s AD Insight</title>
    <link>https://auto-driving-blog.vercel.app/tags/-%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E8%B7%9D%E7%A6%BB/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 🧮 安全距离 on Elon&#39;s AD Insight</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://auto-driving-blog.vercel.app/tags/-%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E8%B7%9D%E7%A6%BB/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>论文精读：Longitudinal Safety Distance Control Considering Cargo Load（ICVES 2025）——RSS 安全距离模型为什么漏算了满载重卡的刹车</title>
      <link>https://auto-driving-blog.vercel.app/posts/paper-reading/%E8%AE%BA%E6%96%87%E7%B2%BE%E8%AF%BB-cargoload-rss/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://auto-driving-blog.vercel.app/posts/paper-reading/%E8%AE%BA%E6%96%87%E7%B2%BE%E8%AF%BB-cargoload-rss/</guid>
      <description>ICVES 2025 论文 Longitudinal Safety Distance Control Considering Cargo Load for Autonomous Heavy-Duty Vehicles 指出经典 RSS 安全距离模型假设车辆质量恒定，忽略了货物载荷，导致满载重卡制动距离更长、RSS 给出的安全距离不足而撞车。本文从 RSS 公式出发，讲清质量/载荷如何修正制动距离，并呼应博客 nuTruck 一文：现有 benchmark 不把质量/动力学安全作为指标。</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
